DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC22603644·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoGRANTED, with leave to amend

MONA MILFORD ET AL VS. D2 PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA LLC ET AL

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Hearing date
Oct 10, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMona Milford
DefendantD2 Properties of Florida LLC
Cross-DefendantPacifisia Investment & Realty Co.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22603644 - October 10, 2025 Hearing date: October 10, 2025 Case number: CGC22603644 Case title: MONA MILFORD ET AL VS. D2 PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22603644 | Case Title: | | MONA MILFORD ET AL VS. D2 PROPERTIES OF FLORIDA LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-10 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 10, 2025, line 2.

Cross Defendant Pacifisia Investment & Realty Co.'s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED, with leave to amend to allege a factual basis for liability against Cross Defendant Pacifisia Investment & Realty Co. ("Pacifisia"). While the parties largely base their arguments on the viability of claims against successive versus concurrent tortfeasors, these arguments do not refer to allegations on the face of the Cross Complaint. The only specific fact alleged in the Cross Complaint regarding Pacifisia is that it is a California Limited Liability Company doing business in San Francisco, California. Although the Cross Complaint incorporates the allegations of the Complaint by reference, Pacifisia is not identified anywhere in the Complaint either. The Cross Complaint does not incorporate any other pleadings. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share