| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication Of Issues
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC21589697 - November 4, 2025 Hearing date: November 4, 2025 Case number: CGC21589697 Case title: FLORENCE KONG VS. MARIANO HERNANDEZ ET AL Case Number: | | CGC21589697 | Case Title: | | FLORENCE KONG VS. MARIANO HERNANDEZ ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication Of Issues | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 4, 2025. Line 1.
CROSS DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication Of Issues is OFF CALENDAR.
Insufficient notice per CCP 437c. Motion filed and e-served on August 6, 2025, set for hearing on October 24, 2025. The Court does not reach any other procedural arguments raised in the opposition at this time. However, should the moving party file another motion the defendant shall comply with all procedural requirements of CCP and CRC. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”