DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF25519268·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 10 months agoPETITIONER NILMAN VAN EWYK's Motion To Compel Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company To Serve Further Verified Responses To Demand For Production Of Documents, Set One; Request For Monetary Sanctions.

IN RE: NILMAN VINCENT VAN EWYK

Motion To Compel Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company To Serve Further Verified Responses To Demand For Production Of Documents, Set One; Request For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Oct 14, 2025
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerNILMAN VINCENT VAN EWYK
RespondentSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

Attorneys

SCOTT E. BRAYBROOKEfor Petitioner

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 302 - CPF25519268 - October 14, 2025 Hearing date: October 14, 2025 Case number: CPF25519268 Case title: IN RE: NILMAN VINCENT VAN EWYK Case Number: | | CPF25519268 | Case Title: | | IN RE: NILMAN VINCENT VAN EWYK | Court Date: | | 2025-10-14 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company To Serve Further Verified Responses To Demand For Production Of Documents, Set One; Request For Monetary Sanctions; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities; Declaration Of Scott E. Braybrooke In Support Of Thereof | Rulings: | | PETITIONER NILMAN VAN EWYK's Motion To Compel Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company To Serve Further Verified Responses To Demand For Production Of Documents, Set One; Request For Monetary Sanctions. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share