MURILLO vs INNOVATIVE HORIZONS CHARTER SCHOOL
MOTION TO COMPEL: FURTHER RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL: FURTHER MURILLO vs RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S CVRI2303819 INNOVATIVE HORIZONS SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, CHARTER SCHOOL SET ONE Tentative Ruling:
Denied. The Motion is untimely. CCP §2030.300(c).
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER MURILLO vs RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S CVRI2303819 INNOVATIVE HORIZONS REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, CHARTER SCHOOL SET ONE
Tentative Ruling:
Denied. The Motion is untimely. CCP §2030.300(c).
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO QUASH PLAINTIFF JANE DOE #2 (C.C.)'S MOTION TO DOE #1 (M.A.) vs QUASH SUBPOENAS ISSUED BY MASSAGE GREEN CVRI2501638 DEFENDANTS GREEN MAGNOLIA, INTERNATIONAL LLC AND JABREY ELJAHMI; AND FRANCHISE CORP. REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:
The Court finds that the Motion is MOOT because Defendants have withdrawn the three subpoenas at issue. The Court issues sanctions against Defendants and their counsel in the amount of $1060 ($500/hour x 2 hours + $60 filing fee) to be paid within fourteen days of this Order.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”