Bruch v. Begley
Motion to Amend Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
The Court finds that a sufficient foundation has been laid for Valdez’s qualifications to answer questions related to her own job duties and responsibilities, and the five questions are clearly within the scope of Valdez’s role as Director. The five questions are within her own job description and relate to her responsibilities and job duties. In addition, her testimony affirming her job duties and responsibilities is a sufficient foundation for her to testify as the custodian of records. GRANT
The Court awards monetary sanctions against the Defendant Hospital in the reduced amount of $1,090 ($350/hour x 3 hours plus $40 filing fee), payable to Plaintiff’s counsel within 30 days.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME RIC1117805 BRUCH VS BEGLEY MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling:
GRANT.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”