DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2400062·riverside·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayDENIED

ALLOR VS ALONSO

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffALLOR
DefendantALONSO

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CVRI2400062 ALLOR VS ALONSO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES Tentative Ruling:

Denied without prejudice. Court finds the motion to be premature.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES TAYLOR VS KIA SET ONE AND MOTION TO CVRI2503929 CORPORATION COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE Tentative Ruling:

Granted. Answer and produce without objections in 10 days. Combined sanctions of $650.00 for attorney fees and $120.00 filing fees payable in 10 days.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MASON VS JS CVRI2603361 SACRAMENTO, INC. MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Tentative Ruling:

Court finds the parties complied with the meet and confer after review of all papers. The Court finds complaint has adequate pleading as to all causes of actions as well as punitive damages request. Demurrer and Motion to Strike Complaint are both denied. Defendant to file an answer within 10 days.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MASON VS JS CVRI2603361 DEMURRER SACRAMENTO, INC. Tentative Ruling:

Court finds the parties complied with the meet and confer after review of all papers. The Court finds complaint has adequate pleading as to all causes of actions as well as punitive damages request. Demurrer and Motion to Strike Complaint are both denied. Defendant to file an answer within 10 days.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share