Jeffery Scott Stephens vs. Sutter Valley Hospitals
Motion to Continue Trial
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
34-2020-00289599-CU-PO-GDS: Jeffery Scott Stephens vs. Sutter Valley Hospitals 07/07/2023 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 47
Tentative Ruling
NOTICE: If oral arguments are requested or appearances are required, the hearing will be conducted remotely via ZoomGov [which includes telephonic and teleconferencing options]. No in person or Court Call appearances will be permitted. You must use your first and last name on your ZoomGov account so the court can positively identify you. The Department 47 ZoomGov ID is: 16173813009. To appear on ZoomGov by phone, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the ZoomGov ID referenced above, available phone commands include *6 to mute/unmute or *9 to raise your hand. If you experience issues joining your hearing, please contact the clerk in Department 47 at (916) 874-5487 for assistance. Any party requesting oral arguments must contact all other parties and advise them that appearances will only be permitted through Zoom.
The notice of motion fails to provide notice of the modifications to Local Rule 1.06 for motions pending before the Presiding Judge. All noticed motions in the Presiding Judges Department shall include the following information in the notice: Local Rule 1.06 (A) is modified such that tentative rulings will be issued two days prior to the hearing date and the party requesting argument is required to provide notice to the Court and counsel of that request by noon the following day. (Additional info available on the Courts website at: https://saccourt.ca.gov/civil/presiding-judge-info.aspx.) Counsel for moving party shall contact all other parties and advise them of the modifications to the tentative ruling system for this motion.
Good cause appearing and no opposition having been received, the motion of Plaintiff Jeffery Scott Stephens (Moving Party or Plaintiff) to continue trial is GRANTED. The Court finds good cause for continuance based on Plaintiffs representation that it recently filed doe amendments naming Doe Defendants West Fork Construction and Separarovich Domich Real Estate Development, and thus, requires additional time to allow the opportunity to conduct discovery with these new defendants. (Oppos., p. 6: 7-11; see also Swartz Decl. ¶ 12, 17; RJN 1, 2.)
The July 26, 2023, MSC and the September 11, 2023, trial dates are VACATED.
This case is referred to the Trial Setting Process for selection of Trial and Mandatory Settlement Conference dates. All counsel (including parties appearing in pro per) shall confer and agree upon trial and settlement conference dates. Available dates can be obtained on the court's web site at http://www.saccourt.ca.gov, or by recorded message at 916-874-6098. Plaintiff's counsel must notify the court of the selection of Mandatory Settlement Conference and Trial dates within 60 days of the date of this order by completing the request form at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/trial-setting.aspx. If the parties have not agreed on dates before the 60th day, court staff shall assign Mandatory Settlement Conference and Trial dates that are next available, unless an extension of time has been granted by the appropriate Case Management Program Judge.
34-2020-00289599-CU-PO-GDS: Jeffery Scott Stephens vs. Sutter Valley Hospitals 07/07/2023 Hearing on Motion to Continue Trial in Department 47
All statutory deadlines, including discovery and expert discovery, shall be governed by the new trial date.
This case has been assigned to Department 47 for hearing. In the event that either party requests a hearing the matter will be heard at 9:30 a.m. in Department 47. Any party requesting an oral argument must contact the clerk at (916) 874-5487 and opposing counsel or parties in pro per by 12:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing. If a proper request for hearing is not made, this shall become the order of the Court.
Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code section 68086 and California Rules of Court, rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp-6a.pdf. Parties may contact Court- Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore available at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/court-reporters/docs/crtrp- 13.Pdf
A Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) is required to be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge prior to the hearing, if not using a reporter from the Courts Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, Once the form is signed it must be filed with the clerk.
If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211) and it must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the proceeding is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will be forward the form to the Court Reporters Office and an official reporter will be provided.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”