DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
1273786·santabarbara·Civil·Decedent's Estate
Hearing over 2 years agoAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

Estate of Curtis A Goller, Jr

Status of Administration / Review

Hearing date
Apr 17, 2024
Department
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Thu, 10/05/2023 - 11:46 Nature of Proceedings 6th Accounting and Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: 6 th Accounting and Conservator Report No appearances required. Recommended for approval. Court Investigator's Biennial Review The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on October 8, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. in the court identified above. Tentative Ruling: Estate of Curtis A Goller, Jr Tentative Ruling: Estate of Curtis A Goller, Jr Case Number 1273786 Case Type Decedent's Estate Hearing Date / Time Wed, 04/17/2024 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Status of Administration / Review Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required.

A status update was filed on April 3, 2024. Public Guardian must come prepared to discuss options for distribution of the property subject to the liens. Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Benjamin Leitcher Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Benjamin Leitcher Case Number 23PR00314 Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Wed, 10/25/2023 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Petition: Appoint Conservator of Person Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: Appearances required. The following issue is noted for the Court at the hearing: Proposed Order Appointing Conservator (GC-340).

Proposed orders must reflect the relief requested in the

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share