Global Assets Liens & Foreclosures LLC vs Alpha Core Inc
CMC; Right to Attach
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
Case Number
Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Mon, 08/31/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings CMC; Right to Attach Tentative Ruling
On May 20, 2024, plaintiff Global Assets Liens & Foreclosures, LLC, (Global) filed its complaint against defendant Alpha Core, Inc. (Alpha) asserting claims for breach of contract and common counts. A default was originally entered against Alpha on January 28, 2025. On February 20, 2025, Alpha filed its motion to set aside the default. On August 4, 2025, the court granted Alpha's motion and set aside the default. On September 18, 2025, Alpha filed its answer to the complaint. In its motion to set aside default, in its answer, and in subsequent documents, Alpha has appeared by counsel, attorney Sydney Hall, whose office address of record is in San Mateo, California.
On March 10, 2026, Global filed its application for right to attach order and for issuance of writ of attachment, together with supporting papers. All proofs of service of these papers shows service by mail solely on Alpha's address in Oakland, California. 'Except for service of a subpoena or other process to require the attendance of the defendant or service of a paper to bring the defendant into contempt, if the defendant has an attorney of record in the action, service shall be made on the attorney rather than on the defendant.' (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 482.070, subd. (e).) There is no proof of service showing service, timely or otherwise, on Alpha's attorney of record.
Accordingly, hearing on this application and the case management conference also set for this date are continued to August 31, 2026, to allow for service by plaintiff of notice of the application, and notice of continuance of the hearing and case management conference." (Minute Order, June 29, 2026, p. 1.)
No proof of service has been filed; no opposition or other response has been filed. If counsel does not appear for the hearing on this matter and show proof of service (see Code Civ. Proc., Sec.Sec. 482.070, subd. (f), 684.210), this application will be taken off calendar. If counsel appears at the hearing with proof of service, hearing on the application will be continued to an appropriate date.
Tentative Ruling: Augustine Munoz et al vs RBP Carpinteria OP LLC et al Tentative Ruling: Augustine Munoz et al vs RBP Carpinteria OP LLC et al
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”