DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR00490·sonoma·Probate·Probate
Hearing in about 1 hourCONTINUED

Guardianship of Faith Marie Crotty

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
61
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 5, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherFaith Marie Crotty

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULING:

APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. The minor attained the age of 21 on November 9, 2025, and as such the guardianship is terminated by operation of law. Case DISMISSED.

5. Guardianship of Lovedeep No Last Name 25PR00444 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. The minor attained the age of 21 on July 2, 2026, and as such the guardianship is terminated by operation of law. Case DISMISSED.

6. Guardianship of Harshdeep Singh 25PR00484 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. The ward has attained the age of 18, and as such continued supervision by the Court via the filing of a Confidential Guardianship Status Report is no longer required. The ward will attain the age of 21 on September 22, 2026, at which time the guardianship will terminate by operation of law. The case is SET on October 6, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 to address dismissal of the guardianship.

7. Guardianship of Faith Marie Crotty 25PR00490 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING:

APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is SET for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on October 5, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share