Guardianship of Nitesh Kumar
Petition for Guardianship; Request for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings
Motion type
Ruling
4. Guardianship of Raul Lopez Hernandez 26PR00699 Appointment of Guardian
TENTATIVE RULING:
APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. Absent objection, the Petition for Guardianship is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner(s). The Court finds good cause to waive and does waive further investigation if any is required under Prob. Code § 1513. Absent objection, the Request for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner. The guardianship will terminate by operation of law when the ward attains the age of 21 on January 26, 2029.
The case is therefore SET on February 6, 2029, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 to address dismissal of the guardianship. Further advisements which are not part of tentative ruling: If any objections are filed at or before the time of hearing, the Court will not adopt the tentative ruling and will, instead, set the matter for a contested hearing and the parties will be notified by the Court as to when they should next appear.
5. Guardianship of Nitesh Kumar 26PR00770 Appointment of Guardian
TENTATIVE RULING:
APPEARANCES ARE NOT REQUIRED. Absent objection, the Petition for Guardianship is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner(s). The Court finds good cause to waive and does waive further investigation if any is required under Prob. Code § 1513. Absent objection, the Request for Special Immigrant Juvenile Findings is GRANTED and the Court will sign the proposed order submitted by Petitioner. The guardianship will terminate by operation of law when the ward attains the age of 21 on January 18, 2027.
The case is therefore SET on February 2, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 to address dismissal of the guardianship. Further advisements which are not part of tentative ruling: If any objections are filed at or before the time of hearing, the Court will not adopt the tentative ruling and will, instead, set the matter for a contested hearing and the parties will be notified by the Court as to when they should next appear.
6. Guardianship of Emma Camilla Velasquez 26PR00774 Appointment of Guardian
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”