CARRILLO vs LOPEZ

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME S. vs SENTINEL MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT CVRI2504100 OFFENDER SERVICES, ON 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT LLC FOR CIVIL RIGHTS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling; the Court requests appearances, either in person or telephonically.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME DEMURRER ON COMPLAINT FOR CVRI2602416 CARRILLO vs LOPEZ AUTO Tentative Ruling: The hearing on the demurrer is continued to October 5, 2026 at 8:30 a.m., because the Court finds the meet and confer inadequate.

Defendant is ordered to meet and confer in person, or via phone or videoconference with Plaintiff for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections raised in the demurrers. As part of the meet and confer process, Defendant shall identify the specific causes of action that it believes are subject to demurrer and identify with legal support the basis of the deficiencies. Plaintiff shall provide legal support for her position that the pleading is legally sufficient or, in the alternative, how the complaint may be amended to cure any legal insufficiency.

After meeting and conferring, Defendant shall 15 days before the continued hearing date set above do one of the following: (1) vacate the hearing on the demurrer, and file an Answer; (2) file with the court a declaration stating the parties have agreed that Plaintiff will file a stipulation and amended complaint before the date set forth above; or (3) file with the court a declaration stating how the parties met and conferred and identifying the specific objections in the demurrer and supporting memorandum of points and authorities that the parties were unable to resolve. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 430.41(a)(3).)

No further briefing will be allowed.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT CVRI2602416 CARRILLO vs LOPEZ ON COMPLAINT FOR AUTO Tentative Ruling: See above.