DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC26639381·sf·Civil·Preliminary Injunction
Hearing in about 2 hoursGRANTED

CALWAY FOODS, INC. VS. JOHN DOE ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCALWAY FOODS, INC.
DefendantJOHN DOE
DefendantBank of America, N.A.

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC26639381 - September 1, 2026 Hearing date: September 1, 2026 Case number: CGC26639381 Case title: CALWAY FOODS, INC. VS. JOHN DOE ET AL Case Number: | | CGC26639381 | Case Title: | | CALWAY FOODS, INC. VS. JOHN DOE ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-09-01 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Preliminary Injunction | Rulings: | | On the Law & Motion/Discovery calendar for September 1, 2026, line 7. PLAINTIFF CALWAY FOODS, INC.'S Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

The unopposed motion for preliminary injunction against Bank of America, N.A. is granted for good cause shown in the moving papers. Bank of America shall not transfer any funds out of account numbers ********1127 or ********7610 (the full account numbers appear in the supporting Huang Declaration) until further order of this court. If Calway wants to supply additional language in a proposed order, it shall supply a proposed order after complying with Rule of Court 3.1312. Calway shall serve the filed order on Bank of America and shall file a proof of service.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share