DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PC-0033433·shasta·Probate·Conservatorship
Hearing todayReport accepted; set for Annual Review on 2027-08-30

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MICHELLE NONNARATH

Review after transfer

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 4, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherMichelle Nonnarath

Ruling

This matter is on calendar for review after transfer in from Tehama County. The Court Investigator’s Report filed on July 22, 2026, has been reviewed and is accepted by the Court. This matter is set for Annual Review on Monday, August 30, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44. The Court notes future accountings were waived pursuant to a court order dated April 11, 2011. The Conservators are reminded of their obligation to file an accounting if the conditions of Probate Code Section 2628 are no longer satisfied. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

CONSERVATORSHIP OF MICHELLE NONNARATH CASE NUMBER: 26PC-0033433 This matter is on calendar for review after transfer in from Contra Costa County. The Court Investigator’s Report filed on July 22, 2026, has been reviewed and is accepted by the Court. This matter is set for Annual Review on Monday, August 30, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44. The Court notes an Order Appointing Probate Conservator of the Person and Estate was filed on December 5, 2024, and letters were issued. An accounting has not been completed and there is no indication that the requirement of an accounting has been waived pursuant to Probate Code Section 2628.

The matter is set for Monday, January 4, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44 for confirmation of filing the Inventory and Appraisal. The First Account and Report of Conservator will cover the time period of December 5, 2024, August 31, 2027, and must be filed with the Court no later than November 22, 2027. The hearing on the First Account and Report of Conservator is set for Monday, December 6, 2027, at 2:30 p.m. in Department 44. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share