DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PG-0033497·shasta·Probate·Appointment of Guardian
Hearing todayCONTINUED; Temporary Guardianship extended.

Guardianship of Aliyana Cutler

Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
42
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 12, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherAliyana Cutler
PetitionerRobert Stubbles
PetitionerRhonda Stubbles

Ruling

GUARDIANSHIP OF ALIYANA CUTLER CASE NUMBER: 26PG-0033497 Disclosure Re: guardianship cases involving Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency-Judge Wood discloses that her step-daughter, Erinn Watts, is the Administrative Branch Director of the Health and Human Services Agency. In that position, Judge Wood’s step-daughter does not have any involvement in the investigation, management, prosecution or defense of guardianship cases. However, the Court makes this disclosure of an employment relationship between an investigating agency and the Court’s first degree relative as required by California Code of Judicial Ethics.

This matter is on calendar for hearing on a Petition for Appointment of Guardian of the Person. The Petition was filed by the minor’s grandparents Robert and Rhonda Stubbles. Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued on July 30, 2026, and are set to expire today unless further extended.

The minor and maternal grandparents/Petitioners have consented to the guardianship and waived notice. Proof of service has been filed for the paternal grandparents and siblings. There is no valid proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Petition for the mother and father, and insufficient information has been provided to permit the Court to dispense with notice to these parties. The proof of service for the mother and father filed on August 13, 2026, indicates service by mail. However, the parents must be personally served in order to move forward on the Petition. Prob. Code § 1511(b). Alternatively, the parents can sign a consent and waiver of notice (GC-211, section 4), in lieu of being served.

The Court has reviewed the Court Investigator’s report filed on August 20, 2026, which recommends granting the Petition. The Court will inquire whether the child is or may be an Indian child. If Petitioners have reason to know that the child is an Indian child, they must make further inquiry to learn about the child’s Indian heritage.

This matter is continued to Monday, October 12, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Department 42 for further proceedings on the Petition. The Temporary Guardianship is ORDERED to remain in effect until the continued hearing date. Petitioners are required to file and serve a new Notice of Hearing for the continued hearing date, along with a copy of the Petition, on the parties identified above. In the alternative, if Petitioners cannot serve the parties identified, the Court will require a declaration explaining in detail all efforts of Petitioners to locate and serve them and why they cannot be served, to permit the Court to dispense with notice. Warning: Failure to properly effect service or provide adequate basis to dispense with service as to the necessary parties will result in denial of the Petition. Notice is preserved. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share