Doe vs. Roe Counselor; Roe School
Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
A default judgment may not be issued against Defendant Sheltraw because the court has vacated entry of default against him.
A default judgment may not be issued against Defendant The Tradesman Electric, Inc. at this time.
Under the one judgment rule, any judgment must encompass both Defendant Sheltraw and Defendant The Tradesman Electric, Inc. unless good cause is shown pursuant to Civil Procedure Code section 579. In this case, no separate judgment has been requested and no good cause has been shown.
Accordingly, the court will deny Plaintiff’s request for a default judgment without prejudice. (fn.1)
(fn.1) Defendant Sheltraw also requests that the court deny Plaintiff’s request for default judgment against both Defendants due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a mandatory arbitration provision. However, the issue of a default judgment is moot for the reasons stated.
The court clerk shall give notice of this ruling.
8 Ferron vs. Lucidi Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication Construction, Inc. There is no tentative ruling at this time. The court will hear from parties or their counsel. 30-2022-01268483
9 Doe vs. Roe Counselor; Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication Roe School Defendant Huntington Beach City School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary 30-2022-01291594 Adjudication of the Issues is CONTINUED to pursuant to the stipulation of the parties.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”