FRONTPOINT RESIDENTIAL, LLC VS. DENNIS ALIWALAS VILLACRUSIS ET AL
Notice Of Motion To Compel Discovery Responses; To Compel Production Of Documents; And For Monetary Sanctions
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26681831 - August 31, 2026 Hearing date: August 31, 2026 Case number: CUD26681831 Case title: FRONTPOINT RESIDENTIAL, LLC VS. DENNIS ALIWALAS VILLACRUSIS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26681831 | Case Title: | | FRONTPOINT RESIDENTIAL, LLC VS. DENNIS ALIWALAS VILLACRUSIS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-31 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion To Compel Discovery Responses; To Compel Production Of Documents; And For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 31, 2026. Line 8.
Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses; to Compel Production of Documents; and for Monetary Sanctions is MOOT in light of the ruling on Defendant's Motion to Consolidate filed in CGC-26-637817. This action is being consolidated with a general civil action. As such, discovery and all other proceedings in this action are now to proceed in accordance with general civil timelines in CGC-26-637817, the lead case.=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”