LORRAINE SMITH VS. EVELYN DARNES ET AL
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And Enter Judgment
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24676171 - August 31, 2026 Hearing date: August 31, 2026 Case number: CUD24676171 Case title: LORRAINE SMITH VS. EVELYN DARNES ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24676171 | Case Title: | | LORRAINE SMITH VS. EVELYN DARNES ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-31 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement And Enter Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 31, 2026. Line 6.
Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Enter Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff for monetary damages in the amount of $5,636.25, pursuant to the terms of the parties' Settlement. The Court makes no ruling or finding regarding Plaintiff's ability to pursue a separate claim against Defendant for the utility charges.=(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”