| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD
Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Monday, October 13, 2025, Line 1. 1 - PETITIONERS TESLA MOTORS, INC., AND ELON MUSK's MOTION TO CONFIRM ARBITRATION AWARD.
Petitioners Tesla Motor, Inc. and Elon Musk's petition to confirm arbitration award is granted. The tentative ruling issued prior to the August 19, 2025 hearing is re-issued with the following addition: I find that the Arbitrator did not pre-decide the choice of law against Ms. Balan prior to receiving briefing on that issue leading to his issuance of the August 29, 2021 order granting Respondents' Motion to Apply California Law.
Viewed in context, the unique and somewhat convoluted facts of this case persuade me that the Arbitrator kept an open mind about the applicable law until after he received the parties' briefs on that issue. Although some of the statements made by the Arbitrator on May 27, 2021 and June 17, 2021, when considered in isolation, suggest that the Arbitrator had decided the choice of law issue prior to receiving briefing on that issue, I find that, when considered in full context, those statements reflect the Arbitrator's preliminary views based on the information he had as of the time the statements were made and were not reflective of a final or conclusive determination and not preclusive of the Arbitrator's full, fair and impartial determination of the choice of law issue after receiving briefing on that issue.
Specifically, I find that at the June 17, 2021 arbitration management conference, when the Arbitrator allowed petitioners to file a choice of law motion, the Arbitrator had not decided the choice of law issue and waited till receiving the parties' briefing on that motion to decide the choice of law issue.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/HEK) | |