DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF23517963·sf·Civil·Administrative Mandate
Hearing 10 months agoDENIED

GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANTGROUP, INC., ET AL VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OFINDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL

Notice Of Hearing Re Petition For Writ Of Administrative Mandate Or Other Appropriate Relief

Hearing date
Oct 24, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffGOLDEN GATE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.
PlaintiffMONU SINGH
PlaintiffHARKIRAN RANDHAWA
DefendantCALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CPF23517963 - October 24, 2025 Hearing date: October 24, 2025 Case number: CPF23517963 Case title: GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANTGROUP, INC., ET AL VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OFINDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL Case Number: | | CPF23517963 | Case Title: | | GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANTGROUP, INC., ET AL VS. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OFINDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-24 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Hearing Re Petition For Writ Of Administrative Mandate Or Other Appropriate Relief | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for October 24, 2025, line 1. PETITIONER GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., MONU SINGH, HARKIRAN RANDHAWA'S Petition For Writ Of Administrative Mandate Or Other Appropriate Relief.

Petitioner Golden Gate Restaurant Group's writ of administrative mandate is denied. The court's tentative ruling in its entirety has been sent to counsel via email.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.)

To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share