DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25627419·sf·Civil·Contract
Hearing 10 months agoDENIED

RUMBLE MARINA CO., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL VS. RUMBLE FITNESS, LLC, A NEW YORK LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Oct 22, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffRumble Marina Co.
PlaintiffJason Mighdoll
DefendantRumble Fitness, LLC
DefendantRumble 1001, LLC
DefendantXponential Fitness, Inc.

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Wednesday, October 22, 2025, Line 7. 2 - DEFENDANTS RUMBLE FITNESS, LLC, RUMBLE 1001, LLC, AND XPONENTIAL FITNESS, INC.'s MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT.

Defendants Rumble Fitness LLC (collectively "Rumble Fitness") et al. move to strike plaintiffs Rumble Marina Co. and Jason Mighdoll (collectively Mighdoll)'s complaint insofar as it seeks attorneys' fees and punitive damages. The court denies the motion to strike.

With respect to attorneys' fees, Mighdoll pleads that he entered into an oral agreement with Rumble Fitness that contained the franchise agreement provisions set out in Exhibit 1. (Compl., para. 47.) Those provisions included a right to attorneys' fees by the company in the event of an enforcement action, which becomes a mutual fee provision by operation of Civil Code, section 1717.

With respect to punitive damages, as discussed in the court's companion order on demurrer, Mighdoll has adequately pleaded fraud. It is well established that fraud gives rise to a claim for punitive damages. (See Civ. Code, section 3294.)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share