DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25624589·sf·Civil·Violation of Uniform Voidable Transactions Act
Hearing 9 months agoTransferred to be heard in department 501

JOAO NUGENT RAMOS PINTO ET AL VS. MARY FONG LAU ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion To File First Amended Complaint For Violation Of Uniform Voidable Transactions Act

Hearing date
Nov 12, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 24, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffJOAO RAMOS PINTO
PlaintiffMARIA CABRAL DE MONCADA
PlaintiffFATIMA CARDOSO
PlaintiffPLINIO FILHO
DefendantMARY FONG LAU

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC25624589 - November 12, 2025 Hearing date: November 12, 2025 Case number: CGC25624589 Case title: JOAO NUGENT RAMOS PINTO ET AL VS. MARY FONG LAU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25624589 | Case Title: | | JOAO NUGENT RAMOS PINTO ET AL VS. MARY FONG LAU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-12 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended Notice Of Motion And Motion To File First Amended Complaint For Violation Of Uniform Voidable Transactions Act | Rulings: | | On the Law and Motion/Discovery calendar for November 12, 2025, line 12. PLAINTIFFS JOAO RAMOS PINTO, MARIA CABRAL DE MONCADA, FATIMA CARDOSO, PLINIO FILHO'S Amended Motion To File First Amended Complaint For Violation Of Uniform Voidable Transactions Act.

Transferred to be heard in department 501 at 9:30 a.m. on November 24, 2025. That Department handles all real property cases per SF Local Rule 8.10A1.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/VJ/DH) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share