DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622291·sf·Civil·Discovery Dispute
Hearing 10 months agoGRANTED in large part; Defendant ordered to produce documents and pay $5,160 in sanctions.

VALERIE GURROLA VS. ROSS STORES, INC. ET AL

Motion To Compel Further Responses And Production To Plaintiff's Requests For Production Of Documents, Set Two And Request For Monetary And Issue Sanctions

Hearing date
Oct 9, 2025
Department
301
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$5,160

Parties

PlaintiffVALERIE GURROLA
DefendantROSS STORES, INC.

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Thursday, October 9, 2025, Line 8. 1 - PLAINTIFF VALERIE GURROLA's Motion To Compel Further Responses And Production To Plaintiff's Requests For Production Of Documents, Set Two And Request For Monetary And Issue Sanctions.

Plaintiff Valerie Gurrola's motion to compel further responses and production to her set two requests for documents and for monetary and issue sanctions is granted in large part. No later than October 23, 2025 defendant Ross Stores, Inc. is required to produce those portions of all versions of its Emergency Procedures Manual and Occupational Safety & Health Program Manual that have been in effect since December 13, 2024 regarding 1) the recording and/or reporting incidents that result in injuries at the Ross Store located at 2300 16th Street in San Francisco (Store) and 2) the preserving evidence pertaining to incidents that result in injuries at the Store. Also no later than October 23, 2025 Ross and/or its counsel must pay Ms. Gurrola $5,160 in monetary sanctions. (The Court's complete tentative ruling has been emailed to the parties.)

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/HEK) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share