DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-0209057·shasta·Civil·General Civil
Hearing todayOSC DISCHARGED; Motion to be Relieved as Counsel DENIED.

Jordan, II v. Site Work Solutions

Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions; Motion to be Relieved as Counsel

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
63
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed
Next hearing
Oct 26, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCharles David Jordan II
DefendantSite Work Solutions

Attorneys

Navid Kanani(JS Abrams Law PC)for Plaintiff

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 25CV-0209057 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions: An Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions issued to Plaintiff Charles David Jordan II and Counsel JS Abrams Law on July 22, 2026 for failure to timely serve the Complaint in violation of CRC 3.110(b). Counsel filed a declaration explaining the reason for the delay. The Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED. The matter will be on calendar on Monday, October 26, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of service.

Tentative Ruling on Motion to be Relieved as Counsel: Navid Kanani of JS Abrams Law PC moves to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiff Charles David Jordan II.

CRC Rule 3.1362 provides the requirements for a motion to be relieved as counsel. In particular, CRC 3.1362 requires the use of specific mandatory Judicial Council forms for the Notice and Motion (MC-051) and Supporting Declaration (MC-052). Both forms and the proposed Order (MC-053) must be served on the client and all parties who have appeared in the case. CRC 3.1362(d). “The service address is the last known residence or business address of the client and the attorney has been unable to locate a more current address after making reasonable efforts to do so within 30 days before the filing of the motion to be relieved.” CRC 3.1362(d)(2). Counsel has not made reasonable efforts to locate a current address for Plaintiff. Additionally, there is no proof of service for the proposed Order, which is required to be served on Plaintiff.

The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel is DENIED without prejudice for lack of proper notice to Plaintiff. The Court is unable to modify the proposed Order submitted. Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to submit an Order consistent with the Court’s ruling.

ROWEN VS. NORTHERN VALLEY CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICE, INC.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share