DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVRI2600332·riverside·Civil·Prejudgment Possession
Hearing todayGRANTED

CITY OF RIVERSIDE vs ROSALIE J. PLUIM

MOTION FOR ORDER OF PREJUDGMENT POSSESSION

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
2
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCITY OF RIVERSIDE
DefendantROSALIE J. PLUIM

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCTION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OF DOCUMENTS FROM CVRI2503807 EDISON COMPANY, vs DEFENDANT ANNE M. BLACKBURN BLACKBURN AND MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:

Hearing continued to September 10, 2026.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE OF PRODUCTION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OF DOCUMENTS FROM CVRI2503807 EDISON COMPANY, vs DEFENDANT MARK S. BLACKBURN BLACKBURN AND MONETARY SANCTIONS Tentative Ruling:

Hearing continued to September 10, 2026.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT CVRI2505443 DUHU vs BROWN ON CROSS-COMPLAINT Tentative Ruling:

Stipulation to Set Aside Entry of Default and the Filing of a First Amended Cross- Complaint; Order on Cross-Complaint of BROOKE BROWN was filed July 21, 2026.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CITY OF RIVERSIDE vs MOTION FOR ORDER OF

ROSALIE J. PLUIM PREJUDGMENT POSSESSION Tentative Ruling:

No opposition filed. Motion granted. The Court grants request for Judicial Notice. Prevailing party to prepare the Order.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share