DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVMV2600865·riverside·Civil·Collections
Hearing todayGranted

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Ghannam

Motion for summary judgment

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
MV1
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$12,412.53

Parties

PlaintiffWells Fargo Bank, NA
DefendantGhannam

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME CROWN ASSET MOTION CIVIL MOTION (MOTION FOR CVMV2502194 MANAGEMENT, LLC VS ENTRY OF JUDGMENT) BY CROWN KISER ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC Tentative Ruling: Off calendar.

No first appearance fee paid by Defendant.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT BY CVMV2509948 VS TORRES WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: Granted.

The judgment is set aside, and the action is dismissed without prejudice.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 664.6 AND ENTRY JUDGMENT UNDER JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, CVMV2600571 TERMS OF STIPULATION N.A. VS BAPTISTE SETTLEMENT BY JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: The dismissal is set aside, and judgment shall enter in the amount of $13,860.00.

4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COMPLAINT FOR COLLECTIONS WELLS FARGO BANK, NA CRC 3.740 (OVER $10,000 DOES NOT CVMV2600865 VS GHANNAM, AN EXCEED $35,000) OF WELLS FARGO INDIVIDUAL BANK, NA BY WELLS FARGO BANK, NA Tentative Ruling: Granted.

Judgment shall enter in the amount of $12,412.53.

5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR STIPULATED JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, CVMV2602231 JUDGMENT BY JPMORGAN CHASE N.A. VS MONTEJANO BANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: Off calendar. Defendant has not paid a first appearance fee.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share