National Funding, Inc. vs. Downtown Partners, Inc.
Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication
Motion type
Ruling
Cooperstown Chiropractic oppose the motion and ask that plaintiff be deemed a vexatious litigant and be sanctioned $1380, representing the attorneys’ fees incurred in opposing the motion and a filing fee of $60.
Plaintiff has not cited any legal authority and does not specify whether she is referring to the Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, the entry of judgment, or the denial of the motion for reconsideration. Nevertheless, the case has been fully litigated and resolved in favor of defendants.
The clerk will give notice. 7 Mall vs. City of Santa Ana
2024-01372814 Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication The court will hear argument. 8 National Funding, Inc. vs. Downtown Partners, Inc.
2026-01539590 Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication
Continued to 11/02/2026 9 Nguyen vs. Thanh
2026-01547251 Motion to Strike - Anti SLAPP
The court will hear argument 10 Nour vs. Al- Khanji
2024-01373153 1. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record (Zeina Sous) 2. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record (Mark El Khanji) On the motions of the Law Offices of Mark Martinez, by Mark Martinez, counsel of record for defendants (1) Mark El Khanji and (2) Zeina Sous for orders relieving it as counsel for each of Defendants, the court notes that while everyone now appears to have been served with the motion papers, there is no notice of continuance or proof of service for the current hearing date.
The court will hear from counsel.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”