DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0002943·nevada·Civil·Family Law
Hearing in 6 daysCase dropped from further Status Conference review

Guerrero, Misty v. Lopez, Mike Jeremie

Status Conference

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerGuerrero, Misty
RespondentLopez, Mike Jeremie

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 09/04/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0002943 Petitioner: Guerrero, Misty Attorney: Self-Represented Respondent: Lopez, Mike Jeremie Attorney: Self-Represented

1. This is the third status conference. Personal appearance is required. No continuance is contemplated by the Court at this time. The case will be dropped from further Status Conference review.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. One of the following: i. FL-120 Response and FL-141 Dec. re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR ii. FL-165 Request to Enter Default from Petitioner more than thirty days after Petition package has been served. Petitioner must provide a stamped envelope addressed to Respondent. If there is an agreement, Respondent must file FL-141 Dec. re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure. OR iii. Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner.

2. The Court notes that a nullity case requires a hearing to have judgment entered. You can use Request to Set Default or Uncontested Hearing FL12 Nevada County Local form to schedule a hearing.

3. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference. __________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share