DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV-0209982·shasta·Civil·Administrative / Civil
Hearing in 2 daysMOOT/DROPPED

Perry v. County of Shasta

Request for Administrative Record, and for Setting Briefing Schedule, and Hearing

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 21, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerPerry
RespondentCounty of Shasta

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 26CV-0209982 DISCLOSURE: Judge Birss worked as an associate attorney at Berg and Associates from June 2014 through September 2018. His prior employment falls outside the time period requiring recusal. That prior employment does not impact his ability to be fair and impartial.

Tentative Ruling on Request for Administrative Record, and for Setting Briefing Schedule, and Hearing: This matter is on calendar for hearing on Petitioner’s request that the Court request the Administrative Record and set a briefing schedule and hearing pursuant to Gov. Code 53069.4(b). The Court finds that this Motion is moot. The Administrative Record was lodged on July 24, 2026. The parties previously stipulated to the briefing schedule set forth in the County’s Proposed Briefing and Hearing Schedule, filed June 10, 2026.

The hearing has been set for October 30, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. All the relief requested in Petitioner’s July 24, 2026 Request has been resolved. The Request is moot and is dropped from calendar. No appearances are necessary. The Court confirms the future hearing date of September 21, 2026 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 64 for further proceedings regarding the Motion for Stay of Enforcement.

IN RE: PETRICK

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share