DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV-0205402·shasta·Civil·Civil
Hearing in 2 daysDENIED

Munnerlyn, et al. v. Martin, et al.

Motion to Set Aside Default

Hearing date
Aug 31, 2026
Department
64
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMunnerlyn
RespondentJonathan Martin

Ruling

CASE NUMBER: 24CV-0205402 Tentative Ruling on Motion to Set Aside: Respondent Jonathan Martin moves to Set Aside Default. No proof of service of the Motion or a notice of hearing are on file. The Court cannot proceed to hear the merits of a Motion unless all parties have been served. Therefore, absent a request from Mr. Martin for a continuance to properly notice the Motion, the Court intends to DENY the Motion for failure to serve.

IN RE: PEACOCK

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share