RICHARD TOD SPIEKER AND CATHERINE REILLY SPIEKER VS. GLADIS PERAZA, ET AL.
Defendants’ Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production, Form Interrogatories and Special Interrogatories
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
August 31, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR PAGE 22 Judge: HONORABLE DAVID A. SILBERMAN, DEPARTMENT 11 ________________________________________________________________________
02:00 PM 26-UDL-00935 RICHARD TOD SPIEKER AND CATHERINE REILLY SPIEKER, CO-TRUSTEES OF THE SPIEKER LINE 10 LIVING TRUST AND DOING BUSINESS AS STONE CREEK APARTMENTS VS. GLADIS PERAZA, ET AL.
RICHARD TOD SPIEKER AND CATHERINE REILLY SPIEKER, CO-TRUSTEES OF STEVEN T. NAUMCHIK THE SPIEKER LIVING TRUST AND DOING BUSINESS AS STONE CREEK APARTMENTS GLADIS PERAZA & PEDRO SANCHEZ PRO PER
DEFENDANTS: GLADIS PERAZA AND PEDRO SANCHEZ’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, FORM INTERROGATORIES AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES
TENTATIVE RULING:
Motion withdrawn by agreement of the parties.
POSTED: 9:56 AM
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”