In the Matter of County of Nevada vs. Craig Hufnagel
Case Management Conference
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
August 31, 2026, Case Management Conference Tentative Rulings
1. CL0003098 A. J. Kirchner vs. Conner Turner Appearances are required. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing file a proof of service or an amended proof of service as ordered by this Court on November 10, 2025.
2. CL0003239 Loan Asset Issuer LLC Series 2021 M 2 vs. Michael Perdue Appearances are required. The parties shall be prepared to update the court on the status of this litigation and setting of court trial dates as necessary.
3. CL0003470 Robert German vs. Susan German Appearances are required. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to appear as required on July 27, 2026, and why this matter should not be dismissed without prejudice with retention of jurisdiction pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 664.6(e).
4. CL0004418 Christopher Hubbs vs. The People of the State of California Appearances are required. Will this claim be opposed, and if so, when will a responsive pleading be filed? Additionally, Petitioner shall confirm that notice of this date has been provided to the Nevada County District Attorney’s Office.
5. CU0001760 In the Matter of County of Nevada vs. Craig Hufnagel No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion the case management conference is continued to December 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit additional time for a compliance agreement to be executed.
6. CU0001796 Sonya Sokolow vs. Environmental Heatlh Director Amy Irani No appearances are required. The Court previously granted Defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend. Defendant shall file the appropriate request for dismissal.
7. CU0002046 Glenn Kalaveras, et al. vs. Kelly Purves No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to December 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.
8. CU0002189 Zachary Goepel vs. Eagle Quick Lube and Car Wash No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to December 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit Plaintiff additional time to file a Second Amended Complaint.
9. CU0002435 Zachary Goepel v. Brilliant Forest Academy, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues this matter to December 14, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, and sets an order to show cause hearing for the same date and time. Plaintiff shall show cause why he should not be sanctioned or this matter dismissed for failing file a proof of service, an application for service by
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”