DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL0004195·nevada·Civil·Family Law
Hearing in 6 daysCONTINUED

Blanton, Shannin v. Blanton, Matthew

Status Conference

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
3
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Mar 5, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerBlanton, Shannin
RespondentBlanton, Matthew

Attorneys

Klein, W. Gregoryfor Petitioner

Ruling

STATUS CONFERENCE TENTATIVE DECISION 09/04/2026, 9:00 a.m. Department 3

Case No. FL0004195 Petitioner: Blanton, Shannin Attorney: Klein, W. Gregory Respondent: Blanton, Matthew Attorney: Self-Represented

1. Status Conference is continued to Friday, 03/05/2027, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 3 of Superior Court of California, County of Nevada, Nevada City Branch. Please check the Court website tentative ruling page to see if a tentative ruling has been posted and if your appearance is necessary. Tentative ruling should be posted on or before 03/02/2027. Any forms listed in item 2 below shall be served and filed no later than ten (10) days before 03/05/2027. Item 3 Judgment forms are not on this schedule. Those shall be filed when a Judgment is ready to be submitted. That is usually when a written agreement has been reached.

2. The Court notes that the following are still required: a. Corrected FL-115 Proof of Service of Summons. FL-115 is not complete. On the 04/17/2026 Proof of Service, the service address is incomplete. On the 07/24/2026 Proof of Service, the list of documents served is missing. If the original server is not available to correct this, the documents will need to be re-served. b. When the Court has the correct Proof of Service, the Court requires one of the following: i. FL-120 Response and FL-141 Dec. re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Respondent, OR ii. Agreement that Respondent has additional time to file Response. Parties may use FL14 Family Law Stipulation (Nevada County) if signed by both parties or MC-030 Declaration if only signed by Petitioner. c. FL-141 Dec. re: Service of Declaration of Disclosure from Petitioner.

3. The standard terms listed at the top of the tentative decision posting are incorporated by reference. __________________________________________________________________

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share