TYEE KYVELOS VS. ADRIAN HOTEL, INC. ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Amended Notice Of Motion To Compel Deposition Of Plaintiff Tyee Kyvelos And Request For Monetary And Terminating Sanctions
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Compel Discovery · Motion for Sanctions
Parties
- Plaintiff: Tyee Kyvelos
- Defendant: Adrian Hotel, Inc.
- Defendant: Shree Hanuman LLC
Attorneys
- Ilan N. Rosen Janfaza — for Plaintiff
Ruling
Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Monday, October 6, 2025, line 7, DEFENDANTS ADRIAN HOTEL, INC., SHREE HANUMAN LLC'S Motion To Compel Deposition Of Plaintiff Tyee Kyvelos And Request For Monetary And Terminating Sanctions
The unopposed motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff Tyee Kyvelos and for sanctions is granted. Code of Civil Procedure, section 2025.450, subdivision (a) provides, "If, after service of a deposition notice, a party to the action . . ., without having served a valid objection under Section 2025.410, fails to appear for examination, or to proceed with it, or to produce for inspection any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice, the party giving the notice may move for an order compelling the deponent's attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice."
This provision requires the court to compel the deposition unless it finds a valid objection was served under section 2025.410. No objection was served here. The motion is therefore granted.
The court orders Kyvelos to appear for deposition by October 27, 2025 at a mutually agreed date. If Kyvelos does not offer at least three dates, defendants may set the date unilaterally.
Defendants seek sanctions against Kyvelos and his counsel. The court concludes that Kyvelos's failure to appear or produced documents lacks substantial justification and that sanctions are appropriate against Kyvelos's counsel. The court awards reasonable sanctions, payable jointly and severally by Kyvelos and Ilan N. Rosen Janfaza, in the amount of $4,000. The court denies relief as to the full amount, basing its award on its assessment of a reasonable number of hours for a motion as straightforward as this one. Sanctions shall be paid within 30 days of entry of this order.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (301/CVA)