Maxim Management Realty Group v. Electro Tech Solutions, Inc.
Petition to Release Mechanics Lien
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
CASE NO.: 26SMCP00353 MOTION: Petition to Release Mechanics Lien HEARING DATE: 8/31/202 6
Legal Standard
Civil Code section 8480 provides that the owner of property may petition the court for an order to release the property from the claim of lien if the claimant has not commenced an action to enforce the lien within the time provided in section 8460. (Civ. Code, Sec. 8480(a).)
Section 8460 provides that "[t]he claimant shall commence an action to enforce a lien within 90 days after recordation of the claim of lien." (Civ. Code, Sec. 8460(a).)
Section 8460 further provides that "[i]f the claimant does not commence an action to enforce the lien within that time, the claim of lien expires and is unenforceable." (Id.)
Section 8460 also provides that the 90-day time limit to commence an action to enforce a lien does not apply if there was an agreement to extend credit and a notice of that fact was recorded within 90 days after recordation of the claim of lien or more than 90 days after recordation of the claim of lien but before a purchaser or encumbrancer for value and in good faith acquires rights in the property. (Civ. Code, Sec. 8460(b).)
A property owner may not petition for a release order until he or she gives the claimant notice demanding that the claimant execute and record a release of lien claim at least ten days before filing the petition. (Civ. Code, Sec. 8482.)
A petition for a release order must be verified and include all of the following: (1) the date of recordation of the claim of lien, with a certified copy of the lien attached; (2) the county in which the claim of lien is recorded; (3) the book and page or series number of the place in the official records where the claim of lien is recorded; (4) the legal description of the property subject to the claim; (5) whether an extension of credit has been granted and if so to what date and that the time for commencement of an action to enforce the lien has expired; (6) that the owner has given the claimant notice under section 8482 demanding that the claimant execute and record a release of the lien and that the claimant is unable or unwilling to do so or cannot with reasonable diligence be found; (7) whether an action to enforce the lien is pending; and (8) whether the owner of the property or interest in the property has filed for relief in bankruptcy or there is another restraint that prevents the claimant from commencing an action to enforce the lien. (Civ. Code, Sec. 8484.)
Civil Code section 8488 provides that the prevailing party is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees. (Civ. Code, Sec. 8488(c).)¿
"The petitioner shall serve a copy of the petition and a notice of hearing on the claimant at least 15 days before the hearing.¿ Service shall be made in the same manner as service of summons, or by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the claimant as provided in¿Section 8108." ¿(Civ. Code Sec. 8486(b).)
Section 8108 provides addresses at which a respondent must be served, depending on the title of the person to be served.
The petitioner bears the burden of proving he complied with service and date for hearing requirements. (Civ. Code. Sec. 8488(a).)¿ ¿
ANALYSIS
Petitioner Maxim Management Realty Group LLC seeks to release a mechanics lien from real property under Civil Code Sec. 8460.
Petitioner owns real property at issue, located at Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90034, Assessor's Parcel No. 4252-030-044 (the "Property"). The recorded lien erroneously identifies the street address as "3750" Glendon Avenue.
The petition alleges that on March 2, 2026, Respondent Electro Tech Solutions Inc. recorded a claim of mechanics lien against the Property for $54,344.00.
The proof of service on file shows service of the Petition on Respondent via certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. The service requirements of Section 8486(b) have therefore been satisfied.¿
The Petition conforms to section 8480. It states that Respondent did not commence an action as required under section 8460. It provides the date of recordation, a certified copy of the lien, the full description of the lien and property, the lack of extension of credit, notice to the claimant, the lack of actions regarding the lien, and the lack of restrains to prevent the enforcement of the lien.
Petitioner sent a written demand for respondent to release the lien. The demand was returned unclaimed, and Respondent has not mailed or recorded a release of the mechanics lien demonstrating that Respondent is unable or unwilling to release the lien. (Buck Dec., P.P. 5-6.)
Petitioner therefore meets their initial burden on the petition, shifting the burden to claimant to show the validity of the lien.
Respondent failed to oppose the Petition. Thus, the Petition must be granted.
Petitioner also demonstrates entitlement to reasonable attorneys' fees of $3,000.00. (Buck Decl., P. 8.)
Accordingly, the petition is GRANTED. Attorneys' fees are awarded in favor of Petitioner and against Respondent in the requested amount of $3,000.00.
Case Number: 26SMCV01314 Hearing Date: August 31, 2026 Dept: M CASE NAME: Handal, v. L.A. Wellness Center
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”