DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26682225·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayCONTINUED

MAN5SAD LLC VS. LUDWIG CALDER ET AL

Defendant Ludwig Calder'S Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Interrogatories, Requests For Admission, And Requests For Production Of Documents And For Monetary Sanctions

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 2, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMAN5SAD LLC
DefendantLUDWIG CALDER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26682225 - August 28, 2026 Hearing date: August 28, 2026 Case number: CUD26682225 Case title: MAN5SAD LLC VS. LUDWIG CALDER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26682225 | Case Title: | | MAN5SAD LLC VS. LUDWIG CALDER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-08-28 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Defendant Ludwig Calder'S Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Interrogatories, Requests For Admission, And Requests For Production Of Documents And For Monetary Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for August 28, 2026.

Line 12. DEFENDANT LUDWIG CALDER Defendant Ludwig Calder'S Notice Of Motion To Compel Further Responses To Interrogatories, Requests For Admission, And Requests For Production Of Documents And For Monetary Sanctions is continued to September 2, 2026 per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share