| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Renew Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
Matter on the Law & Motion/Discovery Calendar for Tuesday, October 21, 2025, line 2, PLAINTIFF KARMA QUICK'S Motion To Renew Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
The unopposed motion to renew the judgment obtained by judgment creditor Karma Quick, nunc pro tunc to July 14, 2025, is continued for hearing to November 14, 2025. The judgment creditor is ordered to supply a declaration and a copy of any judgment renewal form she attempted to file before the deadline to renew. Quick's application does not attach the renewal form she claims she timely filed. The court cannot ascertain from her application whether she submitted an application for renewal that met the statutory requirements set out in Code of Civil Procedure, section 683.140, and therefore whether an order deeming the application filed nunc pro tunc to the date of submission is proper.
Quick shall supplied the supplemental materials at least nine court days in advance of the continued hearing date. The judgment debtor may respond no later than five court days in advance of the continued hearing date.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. = (301/CVA) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”