Alfaro v. Tamayo
Case Management Conference
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
TENTATIVE RULINGS CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CALENDAR Tuesday, September 1, 2026, 3:00 p.m. Courtroom 16 – Hon. Randy Rhodes for Hon. Patrick M. Broderick 3035 Cleveland Avenue, Suite 200, Santa Rosa
TO JOIN “ZOOM” ONLINE, Meeting ID: 161-460-6380 Passcode: 840359 https://sonomacourt-org.zoomgov.com/j/1614606380?pwd=NUdpOEZ0RGxnVjBzNnN6dHZ6c0ZQZz09
The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Broderick’s Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6725 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date.
The following cases are required to appear at 3:00 p.m.: 25CV02061, Calderon v. General Motors, LLC. 25CV02065, Mencarini v. General Motors, LLC. 25CV05532, Alfaro v. Tamayo 26CV01757, Hussey v. Northgate Postacute Care 26CV01792, Bienek v. Burgarin-Quinonez
The following cases will be continued to a further CMC/OSC calendar in Courtroom 16 (no appearance required): 25CV01922, Zhao v. Bobadilla – to 3/23/27 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings 25CV06341, Reyna v. Mills – to 3/23/27 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings 26CV01109, Sanchez v. Gonzalez – to 11/10/26 3:30 p.m., Dept. 16 for an Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Failure to File and Serve a Timely Case Management Conference Statement, Failure to Timely File Proof of Service of Process, and Failure to Prosecute.
An Order to Show Cause shall issue separately. 26CV01737, Burnett, JR v. Adams – to 3/23/27 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings 26CV01745, Sandoval Mancinas v. Arevalo – to 12/1/26 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for proof of service and settled pleadings 26CV01764, Hoffman v. Petaluma Health Center, Inc. – to 3/23/27 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for proof of service and settled pleadings 26CV01784, Dakin v. Proto – to 3/23/27 3:00 p.m., Dept. 16 for settled pleadings
The following cases will be set for trial with notice to follow (no appearance required): NONE
Any cases that do not appear on the list above have been DROPPED from this calendar for various reasons.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”