DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV-05036·merced·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayAppearance required

In the Matter of: Ryan Thomas Schofield

Hearing: In Camera

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

25CV-05036 In the Matter of: Ryan Thomas Schofield

Hearing: In Camera

Appearance required.

26CV-02942 People vs. 1,627.00 U.S. Currency

Motion to Dismiss or Deny Forfeiture Petition Due to Lack of Proper Service and Filing Not Timely

The motion to dismiss or deny the forfeiture petition is DENIED.

Although the petition was not filed within thirty (30) days after Claimant filed his claim, the petition is not dismissed or denied as it was filed within one year of the seizure of the property. (Health & Saf. Code § 11488.4, subd. (a)(2).) Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Motion to Stay Forfeiture Procedures Pending Resolution of Criminal Charges

The motion to stay forfeiture proceedings is GRANTED.

This matter is stayed pending the resolution of the criminal proceedings.

A status hearing is set for February 24, 2027, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8.

26CV-02961 People vs $6,917.00 US Currency

Motion to Dismiss or Deny Forfeiture Petition Due to Lack of Proper Service and Filing Not Timely

The motion to dismiss or deny the forfeiture petition is DENIED.

Although the petition was not filed within thirty (30) days after Claimant filed his claim, the petition is not dismissed or denied as it was filed within one year of the seizure of the property. (Health & Saf. Code § 11488.4, subd. (a)(2).) Accordingly, the motion is denied.

Motion to Stay Forfeiture Procedures Pending Resolution of Criminal Charges

The motion to stay forfeiture proceedings is GRANTED.

This matter is stayed pending the resolution of the criminal proceedings.

A status hearing is set for February 24, 2027, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share