DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
20CV-03134·merced·Civil·Class Action — Wage & Hour
Hearing todayGRANTED

Leobardo Torres, et al. vs L&S Pizza, Inc., et al.

Motion for Final Approval

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
8
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
May 26, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →

Ruling

Hon. Stephanie L. Jamieson Courtroom 8

627 W. 21st Street, Merced

Friday, August 28, 2026 8:15 a.m.

The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4240 to notify the court of your intent to appear.

2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying CourtCall (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court.

Case No. Title / Description

20CV-03134 Leobardo Torres, et al. vs L&S Pizza, Inc., et al.

Motion for Final Approval

The motion for final approval of class action settlement is GRANTED.

The Court has already granted preliminary approval of the settlement, including finding that the amount of the settlement is fair, adequate and reasonable. Nothing has happened since the court made its order that would cause it to change its determination.

The date of final accounting is set for May 26, 2027, at 8:15 a.m. in Courtroom 8.

The Court will sign the proposed order lodged with the court on August 20, 2026.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share