DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2023-01368168·orange·Civil·Other
Hearing todayGRANTED

Aguilar vs. Mommy’s Nutritional Center

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record; Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
C13
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAguilar
DefendantMommy’s Nutritional Center
DefendantOmar Amer

Attorneys

John W. Fagerholm(Law Offices of John W. Fagerholm, Ltd.)for Defendant

Ruling

by the settlement, fees incurred in the enforcement process itself are properly sought by separate motion.

In sum, Itria may be entitled to attorney fees, but the request must be made via a separate motion.

RULING:

Plaintiff Itria Ventures LLC’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement between Itria and defendants Naked Apps, LLC, dba Naked Development, John Thomas Driscoll and Jason David Martinez is GRANTED.

Itria to draft the proposed judgment for the Court’s signature. Any request for attorney fees in connection with this matter shall be made via separate motion.

Itria shall give notice.

15 Aguilar vs. Mommy's 1. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Nutritional Center Record 2. Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of 2023-01368168 Record

Attorneys M. Danton Richardson, John W. Fagerholm, and the Law Offices of John W. Fagerholm, Ltd.’s motions to be relieved as counsel of record for Mommy’s Nutritional Center and Omar Amer are GRANTED.

Moving counsel shall file an amended proposed order with Responding Parties’ (clients) correct address. The current proposed order contains no address.

The order shall become effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the (amended) signed order upon the client. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1362.)

Moving counsel shall give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share