BROWN VS POWERS
Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, and for Sanctions
Motion type
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL (FOR ORDER COMPELLING) FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS INTERROGATORIES, AND FOR SANCTIONS BY PATRICK POWERS, PRESTON POWERS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL (FOR ORDER COMPELLING) FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS ADMISSIONS, SET 1 AND FOR SANCTIONS BY PATRICK POWERS, PRESTON POWERS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL (FOR ORDER COMPELLING) FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET 1, AND FOR SANCTIONS BY PATRICK POWERS, PRESTON POWERS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FOR ORDER COMPELLING) FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS INTERROGATORIES, AND FOR SANCTIONS BY PATRICK POWERS, PRESTON POWERS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
5. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: DEMURRER ON 1ST CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT OF PATRICK POWERS Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
6. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS SET 1, AND FOR SANCTIONS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; AND DECLARATION OF ERIC J. GUINAN Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
7. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, AND FOR CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS SANCTIONS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; AND DECLARATION OF ERIC J. GUINAN Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
8. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES, AND FOR CVPS2504065 BROWN VS POWERS SANCTIONS; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; AND DECLARATION OF ERIC J. GUINAN Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. All discovery motions continued to 10.19.26.
9. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO QUASH PURPORTED DECEASED PSC 1601655 DEBONNE VS DEBONNE PLAINTIFF/JUDGMENT CREDITOR’S SUBPOENA Tentative Ruling: The Enforcement of Judgment Law (“EJL,” Code Civ. Proc., §§ 680.010-724.260) is “a comprehensive scheme governing the enforcement of judgments in California.” [Citation.] (California Costal Com. v. Allen (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 322, 326.) Under the EJL, the postjudgment procedure by which the judgment creditor discovers information directly from a judgment debtor to determine the debtor’s assets through an examination process is set forth under Code of Civil Procedure section 708.110. (Lee v.
Swansboro Country Property Owners Assn (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 575, 581.) Section 708.110 provides in relevant part: “The judgment creditor may apply to the proper court for an order requiring the judgment debtor to appear before the court, or
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”