DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24277238·sf·Civil·Asbestos Litigation
Hearing 10 months agoGRANTED

JOHNNY EISENMAN VS. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Substituting Brandy Brucker As Successor-In-Interest To, And Substituting Successor-In-Interest For, Deceased Plaintiff; For Leave To File First Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Oct 28, 2025
Department
304
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJOHNNY EISENMAN
PlaintiffBrandy Brucker
DefendantGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

Ruling

On Asbestos Law and Motion Calendar for Tuesday, October 28, 2025, Department 304, Line 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Order Substituting Brandy Brucker as Successor-In-Interest to and Substituting Successor-In-Interest for Deceased Plaintiff, and for Leave to File First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. No opposition filed. The Court has executed Plaintiff's proposed order. =(304/EPS) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share