DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680543·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

LEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL VS. JERRY CALDWELL ET AL

Notice Of Motion For Order Quashing Alleged Serivice Of Summons And Vacating Default And Void Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Based On Surprise

Hearing date
Dec 31, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 7, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL
DefendantJERRY CALDWELL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680543 - December 31, 2025 Hearing date: December 31, 2025 Case number: CUD25680543 Case title: LEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL VS. JERRY CALDWELL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680543 | Case Title: | | LEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL VS. JERRY CALDWELL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-31 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For Order Quashing Alleged Serivice Of Summons And Vacating Default And Void Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Based On Surprise; Memorandum | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 31, 2025. Line 5.

DEFENDANT JERRY CALDWELL Motion For Order Quashing Alleged Service Of Summons And Vacating Default And Void Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Based On Surprise; is continued to January 7, 2026 per the order of the presiding judge.=(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share