DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26CV1564·eldorado·Civil·Civil Forfeiture
Hearing todayAPPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED

PEOPLE v. $12,029.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY

Petition for Civil Forfeiture

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
FOUR
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$12,029.00$8,500.00$3,529.00

Parties

PetitionerThe People
RespondentErnesto Cabrera-Estrada
RespondentYasmin Quintero

Ruling

LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR AUGUST 28, 2026

6. PEOPLE v. $12,029.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 26CV1564

Petition for Civil Forfeiture

On July 8, 2026, the People filed a Health and Safety Code section 11488.4,

subdivision (a) petition for civil forfeiture against $12,029.00 in United States Currency.

There are two claimants who oppose forfeiture: (1) Ernesto Cabrera-Estrada, who claims

a partial interest of $8,500.00; and (2) Yasmin Quintero, who claims a partial interest of

$3,529.00.2

Under California state law, where, as here, forfeiture is contested, a judgment of forfeiture requires as a precondition that a defendant be convicted in an underlying or

related criminal action of one of the offenses specified in Health and Safety Code

section 11470, subdivisions (e) or (g), which offense occurred within five years before

the seizure or the notification of intention to seek forfeiture.

It is the court’s understanding that there are multiple related criminal prosecutions

pending against claimant Ernesto Cabrera-Estrada, including El Dorado County Case

Numbers 25CR2338, 25CR2404, and 26CR0792C. The court is unaware of any related

criminal case against claimant Yasmin Quintero.

TENTATIVE RULING # 6: APPEARANCES ARE REQUIRED AT 1:30 P.M., FRIDAY,

AUGUST 28, 2026, IN DEPARTMENT FOUR, AT WHICH TIME, THE COURT WILL ASK THE

PARTIES TO CONFIRM THE STATUS OF THE RELATED CRIMINAL CASE(S).

2 The People originally initiated civil forfeiture through a notice of administrative

proceedings. On June 3, 2026, Ernesto Cabrera-Estrada filed a claim opposing forfeiture under the instant case number. That same day, Ms. Quintero filed a separate claim opposing forfeiture under El Dorado County Case No. 26CV1565. On July 8, 2026, the court, on its own motion, consolidated the cases for all purposes and designated the instant case as the lead case.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share