DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25680312·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JOHN ZIMMER ET AL

MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD

Hearing date
Dec 19, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 24, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTHE JOHN STEWART COMPANY
DefendantJOHN ZIMMER ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680312 - December 19, 2025 Hearing date: December 19, 2025 Case number: CUD25680312 Case title: THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JOHN ZIMMER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680312 | Case Title: | | THE JOHN STEWART COMPANY VS. JOHN ZIMMER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 19, 2025 line 16.

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD is continued to December 24, 2025 per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share