DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU293519·tulare-civil·Civil·Settlement
Hearing todayGRANTED

Becerra, Kevin vs. Pacific Distributing, Inc.

Continued Hearing re: Final Distribution of Settlement Fund

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Moving Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$5,868.43

Parties

PlaintiffKevin Becerra
DefendantPacific Distributing, Inc.

Ruling

Case No.: VCU293519 Date: August 27, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 1-The Honorable David C. Mathias Motion: Continued Hearing re: Final Distribution of Settlement Fund Tentative Ruling: At the prior hearing, the Court noted the declaration from the settlement administrator indicating that the uncashed funds would be sent to the State Controller around July 30, 2026. The settlement administrator has provided a further declaration indicating that a total of 4 settlement checks, totaling $5,868.43, remain uncashed and that these funds, on July 21, 2026, were distributed to the California State Controller's Office - Unclaimed Property Fund.

No appearances are necessary. If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings.

Re: Salado-Gomez, Reyes vs. The Gary and Donna De Graaf Family Trust

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share