DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679679·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 8 months agoCONTINUED

MARGARET EIDT VS. MOHAMMED ROLAND ET AL

Notice Of Motion, Motion For Admissions To Be Deemed Admitted, Motion To Compel Discovery Responses, Request For Sanctions

Hearing date
Dec 16, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 19, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMARGARET EIDT
DefendantMOHAMMED ROLAND
DefendantMUHAMMAD ROWLAND

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679679 - December 16, 2025 Hearing date: December 16, 2025 Case number: CUD25679679 Case title: MARGARET EIDT VS. MOHAMMED ROLAND ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679679 | Case Title: | | MARGARET EIDT VS. MOHAMMED ROLAND ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-12-16 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion, Motion For Admissions To Be Deemed Admitted, Motion To Compel Discovery Responses, Request For Sanctions | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for December 16, 2025. Line 7.

DEFENDANT MUHAMMAD ROWLAND (SUED AS "MOHAMMED ROLAND") Motion For Admissions To Be Deemed Admitted, Motion To Compel Discovery Responses, Request For Sanctions; is continued to December 19, 2025 per stipulation of the parties. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share