DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000055·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayAPPEARANCE REQUIRED

Estate of James E Lough

PETITION FOR INSTRUCTION TO REVOKE TRUST BY ITS OWN TERMS

Hearing date
Aug 27, 2026
Department
B
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJames E Lough

Ruling

In light of the concurrent ruling on Auberge’s Motion to Compel Arbitration, the instant Motion is MOOT.

PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Conservatorship of James Edward Zabriskie 23PR000103

[1] SECOND ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF CONSERVATOR; PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF FEES TO CONSERVATOR OF PERSON AND ESTATE AND ATTORNEY FOR CONSERVATOR

[2] REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed. After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial and for an Accounting in two years on July 28, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. All accounting documents must be filed at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

Estate of Karl J Porter 24PR000279

REPORT OF ADMINISTRATOR, PETITION FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION AND FOR STATUTORY ATTORNEY’S FEES WITH WAIVER OF ACCOUNT (filed 2/13/26)

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.

Estate of James E Lough 26PR000055

PETITION FOR INSTRUCTION TO REVOKE TRUST BY ITS OWN TERMS

APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The Petition is in order and Petitioner has submitted evidence which, if the Petition is uncontested, is sufficient to prima facie support the requested relief. (See Prob. Code § 1022.) However, all interested parties have the right to appear and object to the Petition orally or in writing at the hearing. (See Prob. Code § 1043.) If no one appears to oppose the petition, the Court intends to grant the Petition as prayed.

7

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share