DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0057427·placer·Civil·Structured Settlement Transfer
Hearing in about 4 hoursDENIED

IRPO MIC-BRY8

Amended Petition for Approval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payments

Hearing date
Aug 28, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,000.00

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR AUGUST 28, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

19. S-CV-0057427 IRPO MIC-BRY8

NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on AUGUST 28, 2026 AT 1:00 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.

Amended Petition for Approval of Transfer of Structured Settlement Payments

The petition is denied without prejudice.

The court has carefully considered the supporting declarations and documents submitted in relation to the petition. There has been an insufficient showing that the transfer is in the best interest of the payee. Specifically, the payee attests that he does not rely upon the annuity payments in paragraph 4 of his declaration. However, the payee goes on to attests to unpredictable income due to the cessation of annuity payments that will occur in 2027. (Payee’s declaration ¶6.) Furthermore, the payee contends that he will purchase a separate annuity with a portion of the proceeds but does not provide any further information or documents to support the assertions that the purported investment amount will yield the asserted $1,000.00 per month. (Ibid.)

The court declines to grant the request until such time as these matters are resolved through the submission of further declarations and documentation.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share